Edwin J. Viera, Public News Service
A federal bill could spell trouble for New York farmers.
The Ending Agricultural Trade Suppression Act would remove local and state governments’ power to enact policies affecting farms. Studies show it could spell the end for more than 1,000 public health, safety and welfare laws.
Michael Chameides, a member of the Columbia County Board of Supervisors, said farmers do not want such vital farm laws terminated.
“There’s a real urgency to pass a robust Farm Bill that really does support rural communities and support farmers and support people all around the country to get healthy, safe and affordable food,” Chameides contended. “There’s lots of reasons for Congress to take action to support farmers and the EATS Act is not it.”
The measure began as a way to counter the animal welfare laws enacted through California’s Proposition 12. The National Pork Producers Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court about Proposition 12. After the court rejected it, several Republican governors sent a letter to Congressional lawmakers urging the reintroduction of the act.
Recently, the Columbia County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a resolution opposing the EATS Act.
Some lawmakers want to put elements of the act into the Farm Bill. But Chameides noted what farmers really need is access to land, loans and support from the federal government through the Farm Bill. He argued the bill’s effects on New York would mean repealing laws ranging from controlling invasive species to animal welfare.
“Rolling those laws back you might see the spread of either diseases or invasive species which are going to have both public health impacts,” Chameides pointed out. “But also that it could impact the viability of certain kinds of farming.”
Chameides noted regional response laws are important because of the rapid and often unpredictable nature of certain invasive species and the spread of disease. He added passing the act could upend states’ rights.